Skip to main content

What a riot.


What a Riot.

Upset!  Was created with the Latino students enrolled in the Plaza de la raza program with CAP. This process encouraged the students to look deep into history and highlighted their views and understanding of it. The “Joker system” allowed their ideas to be presented encouraging the audience to participate which started a deep dialogue in which all parties could feel that their ideas mattered. the purpose of this system is to raise questions.  I found the use of this device from theater of the oppressed to be very successful, because it brought the attention to  the process of people’s find their way to understanding not just the outcome of already crafted opinions. 
I do wonder what this might have been like if the students themselves created their own material through this process instead of using the layout that was given to them?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...

Mind Map

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?