Skip to main content

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project?

There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative.

2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project?

Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem.

3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content?

Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on.



4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project?

The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the donors were invested because they likely wanted to feel their money/services were not wasted.

5. AUDIENCE: For whom was this project conceived? 

For adults, primarily middle class white adults, to better understand how multi-faceted teenagers, primarily impoverished teenagers of color, truly are.

6. ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES: How were the stakeholders, audiences, and others engaged/connected to the project?

There was a coordinated planning of the event including media coverage to ensure there were enough attendees and the project had a wide enough impact.


7. GOAL: What are this project's objectives?

To build understanding between teenagers and the rest of society and to empower the teenagers toward self-expression and self-worth.


8. VALUES: What were the project's guiding values or core beliefs? How were they expressed in the process?

That teenagers are capable of being very intelligent and good. That they are so much more than what they are so commonly portrayed as in the media. And that was expressed from the mouths of the teenagers themselves during the performance.

9. RESOURCES: What tangible and intangible resources were used to pursue the project's goals?

Tangible: Cars, signs to decorate, parking garage, teenagers, time, money, adults, teachers, planners, the media, the community.

Intangible: Passion, patience, confidence, appreciation, listening.

10: OUTCOMES: What were the results of this project? 

The teenagers seemed to really appreciate being listened to, and the audience members seemed very surprised at how tragic the lives of many of these teenagers are.The audience seemed to feel that society had let the teenagers down and should be doing a lot more to take care of and encourage them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?

Gun violence in the Hollywood industry

Hollywood wants gun control for everyone BUT THEM! In the society where the nudity on the screen (sometimes in the theater, even at CalArts) is a huge issue, gun violence scenes are in many movies in the Hollywood industry and nobody care. Actors sign their contracts, do their characters, get their awards and then try to talk about gun violence and share their moral beliefs. Come on, stop being hypocrites and say NO! ,, The US is home to both the largest percentage  of guns per capita and the most influential entertainment industry on earth. And while there is ceaseless debate over the violence in our nation, there is no question that, on our screens, it is at an all-time high — no more so than in PG-13 films .  Since that rating was created in 1985, deceptions of guns  on screen has more than tripled. Movies are more violent ratings more lenient, and overall gun-use in the film has risen approximately 51% in the last decade." https://www.refinery29.com/201...