I grew up a lot hearing and learning about Augusto Boal. Theater of the Oppressed is basically theater that brings about social change. In Lebanon, I grew up seeing a lot of street theater that would be heavily influenced by the country's political climate. As a child I had a vague understanding of what it truly meant to be performing the way they were. It wasn't until high school that I started to view Lebanese street theater/art differently. My theater teacher at the time was very aware of Lebanon's political state and introduced us to Augusto Boal and his practices. Since then, I started looking at theater, film and art in ways I could not have before. Almost everything for me became political from then on. I felt that the urgency of art that fits into Theater of the Oppressed is one that is necessary for social, political, and economic change. I try to emulate or reflect the Lebanese struggles of war, poverty and corruption in nearly everything I create, be it satirical or dramatic
Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level. I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known. I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?