Skip to main content

What A Riot Reflection/Wonderings

Reflections/Findings:
The concept of The Joker System and its components made it more clear to me how Theater of the Oppressed could be used to create a work of theater that has structure and characters beyond a set of exercises that hold a potential multitude of characters and representations for one scenario. The Joker System, already present in Theater of the Oppressed provides a clearer structure for performance rather than something experiential.

I do agree that there is some element of the students’ voices that are lost when a professional playwright is charged with collecting their words and rearranging them in a manifested structure. However, given time constraints and keeping in mind that this was likely many of the students first experience of devised theater, I understand the necessity of the involvement of a playwright and that playwright’s voice and experience being included. I wonder if given more time and more opportunity for the students to explore the research and the process themselves, if they could have come up with an entirely student devised performance.

It was interesting to me that these students’ way of reflecting back on their own histories and exploring their own identities was to explore certain themes through the lens of another culture and identity, and that the element of alienation in the performance was said to have allowed them to do this from a safe distance conducive to big picture reflection.


Wonderings:
I’m interested to know more about the concern that the professional team was indoctrinating or “proselytizing” the students with their own beliefs, especially when it comes to the parents. Could this project and its subject matter be dangerous for the students to learn about and participate in in their lives outside of the program? If so, how does this further inform the project, it’s handling of the subject matter, and its process?
In what ways could the process have been more inclusive of the students’ words and feelings?

Could this project be opened up to include whole families or entire classrooms including teachers and administrators? How would that change the process and its outcomes?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?
Post a Comment
Read more

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gun violence in the Hollywood industry

Hollywood wants gun control for everyone BUT THEM! In the society where the nudity on the screen (sometimes in the theater, even at CalArts) is a huge issue, gun violence scenes are in many movies in the Hollywood industry and nobody care. Actors sign their contracts, do their characters, get their awards and then try to talk about gun violence and share their moral beliefs. Come on, stop being hypocrites and say NO! ,, The US is home to both the largest percentage  of guns per capita and the most influential entertainment industry on earth. And while there is ceaseless debate over the violence in our nation, there is no question that, on our screens, it is at an all-time high — no more so than in PG-13 films .  Since that rating was created in 1985, deceptions of guns  on screen has more than tripled. Movies are more violent ratings more lenient, and overall gun-use in the film has risen approximately 51% in the last decade." https://www.refinery29.com/201...
Post a Comment
Read more