I think this text is really brilliant. I love the constant breaking of the fourth wall and the way that the audience gets to be fully informed about what this play is. It's almost like a combination news article and greek play. I particularly enjoy the use of the chorus and I think it's a great way to make sure that all of the kids could feel like they had a voice. I think the way that Schultzman went about connecting with the kids in finding people from history that interested them, was a really smart way to create a dialogue about something that they could feel passionate about. I do wonder if there' s a way to take this same technique where you explain things to the audience, but to give a little bit less away of the process. I really enjoyed that aspect while reading it and I enjoyed that the joker had such free reign, but I wonder if the effect would be the same or better with some small changes to preserve the imaginary world of the play. For example, can everyone stay in character all the time, even though those characters can step out of the story?
Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level. I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known. I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?
Comments
Post a Comment