Skip to main content

Theatre of the Oppressed

I found the approaches taken by Augusto’s Boal’s theatre to be very interesting.  One of the points that really caught my attention, was how we, the physical people have adapted our bodies, unknowingly to the jobs we perform everyday.  In a way it’s like a constant form of method acting.  It makes sense though, because as stated in the text, we adjust our personalities to the jobs we have or our personalities change because of the work we participate in.  The games and approaches he took to unwind people from these habits, seemed to be ones that would also spark a good deal of emotion, mostly positive unless the particular tasks cause unneeded stress. 
I think the collaboration he chooses to have with his artists are admirable and respective.  He seems to listen to what they want as well as the actors to the audience, just like with the women who couldn’t read, finding out her husband was cheating on her.  They had a great respect for themselves as well as the audience to incorporate them in their process.  Another example was the factory worker.  There couldn’t be a decisive decision made on what to do (to benefit the employee) no solution could be greatly agreed upon, so they took audience suggestions and attempted to work through it as best as possible, but it’s this conclusions that is sometimes needed to help create and figure out work.  As we all know, if we don’t have some kind of collaboration then we won’t have art.  If the actor doesn’t decide to collaborate with the director there is no show, if the actors can’t collaborate amongst each other there is no show, and if the audience can not collaborate by bringing themselves to watch there performance, then again, there is no show.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...

Mind Map

What a Riot - Bri Pattillo

   I like the Theater of the Oppressed methodology of the Joker. It sort of reminded me of El Pachuco in “Zoot Suit”, like this narrator commenting on all the action. I thought the Joker methodology was a good way to introduce a Theater of the Oppressed tactic into the piece. A lot of the Theater of the Oppressed options that we read about last week have an element of questioning within in them, but I think the Joker was a good one to use with young people. It was nice and cool that she was able to include the students’ actual questions into the play.     I did think her approach was rather problematic. She highlighted the problem herself and posed the question, “To whom and to what is the author beholden when writing a play for a specified population that has been invited to contribute to the playwriting process?” My problem was her answer, when she said that the students didn’t understand all of the references or language in the play. I don’t...