- Context: EDT’s Transborder Immigrant Tool caused grand controversy and an investigation by the government.
- Content: To guide immigrants crossing the southern border to water while providing poetry.
- Form: A phone app
- Stakeholders: EDT/ b.a.n.g. lab artists
- Audience: People crossing the Mexican/US border
- Engagement strategies: Technology and art through poetry
- Goal: Most recognizably, the goal was to help guide immigrants safely to the US.
- Values: They value art as a mean to reach multiple audiences, express a message, help others, and keep a conversation.
- Resources: Artists, UCSD, the app, cell phones
- Outcomes: It caused a lot of controversy and EDT/b.a.n.g. received a lot of hatred for their work. But more so, they saved lives and created more of a conversation about this issue.
1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...
Comments
Post a Comment