Skip to main content

Poetry, Immigration and the FBI Fiona Dornberger

1. CONTEXT: 

The circumstances were the issues of immigration from one place to another, especially in relation to the Mexican-American border, and a need for these immigrants to find water sources as they crossed the border. 

2. CONTENT: 

The issues of crossings done by immigrants vs. the constant traversals of chemicals and trash from one side to the other. Immigrant restrictions are high, but chemicals and trash move much more freely. 

3: FORM: 

The poems and directions were given via phone, the recordings of poems being read allowed.

4. STAKEHOLDERS: 

Invested in the project were Dominguez, students at UCSD, and EDT? 2.0/b.a.n.g. lab. Funds for the project came from UCSD. 

5. AUDIENCE: 

The audience was meant for immigrants journeying across the border, and the project has extended to include other borders as well. 

6. ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES: 

The project brought about a lot of controversy with UCSD, the FBI, the Republican Party and Fox News, so it extended much beyond just the immediate audience. 

7. GOAL: 

Goals were to explore the trans nature of borders and human interaction with borders, to bring to light the immorality of stopping the flow of human travel, while allowing for chemicals and trash to move freely. 

8. VALUES: 

It is believed that humans do not naturally exist under borders, and neither does nature, animals or water. They were expressed by bringing humans to natural water sources and by connecting poetry to the journey. 

9. RESOURCES: 

Poetry and videos can be found on Vimeo which were made of collaging photos, and recorded poetry. I'd like to know more about this segment overall though, because the article didn't go deeply in detail about resources specifically. 

10: OUTCOMES: 

The results were that Dominguez did not get indicted or lose his tenure, but gained exposure for the issue, and gained support from Water Station Inc. and Border Angels. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...

Mind Map

What a Riot - Bri Pattillo

   I like the Theater of the Oppressed methodology of the Joker. It sort of reminded me of El Pachuco in “Zoot Suit”, like this narrator commenting on all the action. I thought the Joker methodology was a good way to introduce a Theater of the Oppressed tactic into the piece. A lot of the Theater of the Oppressed options that we read about last week have an element of questioning within in them, but I think the Joker was a good one to use with young people. It was nice and cool that she was able to include the students’ actual questions into the play.     I did think her approach was rather problematic. She highlighted the problem herself and posed the question, “To whom and to what is the author beholden when writing a play for a specified population that has been invited to contribute to the playwriting process?” My problem was her answer, when she said that the students didn’t understand all of the references or language in the play. I don’t...