Skip to main content

Brandon M. - THE ROOF IS ON FIRE

Brandon M.




  1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project?
  2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project?
  3. FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content?
  4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project?
  5. AUDIENCE: For whom was this project conceived? 
  6. ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES: How were the stakeholders, audiences, and others engaged/connected to the project?
  7. GOAL: What are this project's objectives?
  8. VALUES: What were the project's guiding values or core beliefs? How were they expressed in the process?
  9. RESOURCES: What tangible and intangible resources were used to pursue the project's goals?
  10. OUTCOMES: What were the results of this project? 

1. I believe there were many but the roots of this project were mainly around the fact that these kids had no voice, when it came to their social or political issues, not many were being heard. The purpose of the project was to shine light on these issues and to clear up the image that was being painted by the media about who these kids were.

2. This project helped to highlight the fact that these kids were being portrayed as criminals by the media, by one students actions, all would pay unfairly.

3. The medium was when the students created an immersive group that would help filter any issue they were facing, whether it be at home or at school.

4. The teachers, faculty and especially the students from Oakland HS.

5. I believe this project was conceived for those that have any misinterpretation of the students and in general, any individual of color.

6. The audience members being the faculty, parents, people from the board and community members, sat and heard the work of the students. The students had the opportunity to speak for themselves and convey their message through art.

7. The projects ultimate goals was to give these individuals a voice in which they could express and attend to issues at hand. Mainly to speak about the way they were being depicted among the media.

8. The value of this project was to understand in a sense, how these students perceive todays world. With them being the ones who face the consequences of the generation before, many don't seem or can't seem to speak up about their current situation, whether it be political or not.

9. The students and audience members.

10. This project helped she light on a social issue, providing a voice for these teenagers who have been held against something they didn't commit. This project also helped these teenagers speak up about changes that need to happen, whether it be a personal experience or something they witnessed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...

Mind Map

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?