Skip to main content

Aesthetic Evangelists ~Inobe

In my humble opinion, producing community art is a major responsibility. It can be used to build self-esteem and growth in the community. Most importantly I do believe it could be a response to systematic oppression, and as a result, it can spark conversations and possibly lead to policy and laws changing

Key ideas that resonated with me:
Ø  This quote: “The trouble with a lot of politically motivated art is a failure of nerve. Artists who produce work that they know is not favored by our established regime are not necessarily taking risks since they can forecast the results. Truly taking a risk means not knowing what's going to happen in the end”.

Ø  Secondly, I agree when creating community-based art with highly complex populations e.g. the homeless, mental health, and incarcerated should engage in major research, and public policy surrounding the issues so community member’s involved are armed with tools to help permanently change their situations for the better.

Ø  Another point from the reading that I definitely would add to my checklist when creating community art is being “conscious of the broader politics of funding to develop effective strategies to challenge them”. This is key to a successful project and securing funding.


Ø  I’m curious to hear from other artists about their process working with communities. The guests’ artist from last week was refreshing and inspiring.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?
Post a Comment
Read more

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gun violence in the Hollywood industry

Hollywood wants gun control for everyone BUT THEM! In the society where the nudity on the screen (sometimes in the theater, even at CalArts) is a huge issue, gun violence scenes are in many movies in the Hollywood industry and nobody care. Actors sign their contracts, do their characters, get their awards and then try to talk about gun violence and share their moral beliefs. Come on, stop being hypocrites and say NO! ,, The US is home to both the largest percentage  of guns per capita and the most influential entertainment industry on earth. And while there is ceaseless debate over the violence in our nation, there is no question that, on our screens, it is at an all-time high — no more so than in PG-13 films .  Since that rating was created in 1985, deceptions of guns  on screen has more than tripled. Movies are more violent ratings more lenient, and overall gun-use in the film has risen approximately 51% in the last decade." https://www.refinery29.com/201...
Post a Comment
Read more