Skip to main content

Aesthetic Evangelist - Bri Pattillo

This was such a good article! This article touched on a lot of things we discussed last semester, but really broadened and defined them.

1.    It made me think a lot about J.R. and his work with different groups. Both he and the author share this idea that the process is as important, if not more important, than the product. If you are creating work in an unethical way, does it matter how beneficial the outcome is? As artists we must check ourselves along the way to make sure that all aspects of the process are in-line with our message and goal.
2.    This article definitely opened my eyes to some of my personal preconceptions. I think that I used to view myself in the romantic manner described, the artists who crosses boundaries and goes into dangerous terrain etc. Through art activism class last semester, and this class this semester, I’m seeing how much deeper and wider one must approach the idea of art activism within a community, and the tricky pitfalls one might face that could make the work problematic.
3.    The example of Alfredo Jaar’s exhibit “One or Two Things I Know About Them” and when the author described how he “used his professional authority as an expert in the regulation of symbolic meaning to override collaborator Gayatri Spivak’s objection to his decision” to present the images of the women with crude words interested me in several ways. Just that sentence, “his professional authority as an expert in the regulation of symbolic meaning”, it’s ridiculous, I wrote in the margin “lol, wtf” I then had to take a picture of the page and send it to my best friend Jon who is a photographer. We then had a discussion about the ethics of the photographer in relation to their subject. His personal body of work deals a lot with people all over the world, and we wondered how he might respond if one of the people in his photos ever asked that it not be shown. We also talked about how photos create context, what is within and also about of the frame, and what is in the gallery, creates the context through which the artist wants you to see the work. What is presented will always betray a hidden agenda or the artist’s person views on the subject, even if they think it is being presented in a neutral manner.


1.    One question the article evokes is how can we avoid the trap of the conservative/Victorian vision of community art and the artist’s role within that.
2.    What is a politically coherent community? How can we work to develop more?

3.    What if society places someone within a community but they don’t self-identify as being a part of? Can we still say that they are part of that community?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?
Post a Comment
Read more

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gun violence in the Hollywood industry

Hollywood wants gun control for everyone BUT THEM! In the society where the nudity on the screen (sometimes in the theater, even at CalArts) is a huge issue, gun violence scenes are in many movies in the Hollywood industry and nobody care. Actors sign their contracts, do their characters, get their awards and then try to talk about gun violence and share their moral beliefs. Come on, stop being hypocrites and say NO! ,, The US is home to both the largest percentage  of guns per capita and the most influential entertainment industry on earth. And while there is ceaseless debate over the violence in our nation, there is no question that, on our screens, it is at an all-time high — no more so than in PG-13 films .  Since that rating was created in 1985, deceptions of guns  on screen has more than tripled. Movies are more violent ratings more lenient, and overall gun-use in the film has risen approximately 51% in the last decade." https://www.refinery29.com/201...
Post a Comment
Read more