Skip to main content

Aesthetic Evangelism- Rachael Hinman

Key Ideas-
Wow. I never realized the government’s role in community based art. One thing I’ll probably never forget from reading this is the idea that “state sponsored welfare is wrong because it robs the rich of the opportunity to experience a moral transcendence in the act of self-less giving.” What? Because giving is actually for the moral transcendence of the giver and not to benefit the receiver? How is that even a valid argument?
This really opened my eyes because I’ve never heard of this argument before. This discussion about trying to help others for one’s personal spiritual evolution, and not actually to see someone else benefit. It’s crazy to think, but also obviously true, that people feel entitled to tell someone else when they are wrong and to put themselves in a higher position of right to “fix” them and doing so gives them the gratification and the sense of more power. But the intention is all wrong. Who is to say who is right and who is wrong? Typically it’s those of power and money who feel they are right because they are financial successful; so they must be right, right?
No thank you.

Also, the reality of creating community based art to benefit a community but contributing to conservative viewpoints and standards is something I’ve never realized. This also ties in to the topic of having community art where the artist is automatically “right” and tries to fix or improve the “wrong” and how that is clearly problematic; especially when the artist has absolutely no connection, insight, or identity with that community.

My last key topic is between chosen delegates and appointed delegates to be the artist/director of a community based art piece. Often times a chosen delegate has a predisposition of what, how, and why a community acts, is, and believes and that puts up barriers from the very beginning. There will most likely be a completely different outcome if a community chooses a delegate to be the director of a piece because there is already a baseline trust, open mindedness, and willingness to learn, both for and from the community.


Questions-
Is someone truly able to completely sunder themselves from their subjects and feel someone else’s oppression as mentioned in the text?
If the art does create a positive impact for the community, does that automatically make it community-based art even if it doesn’t touch on the public policies?

How can we accurately create community based art with communities we don't identify with?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theater of the Opressed: Kazmiera Tarshis

Theater of the opressed exists to engage the audience and community in the perfrmance. It offers a vehicle for social change at a very accessible level.  I think the idea of asking the audience what the right choice is or to come up on stage and be a part of the performance is such an interestig cocept. It reminds me of those books that are "choose your own adventure". This seems to be a belief that many different theaters have in their own company beliefs section so it seems to be a relatively popuar idea within the theater world. Or, at leat, well known.  I wonder if having the play interrupted would ruin the imaginary world which has been created. Is there a better way to get the audience involved without changing the traditional structure of a play?
Post a Comment
Read more

Jeremy Griffith - The Roof is on Fire

1. CONTEXT: What were the circumstances that framed the meaning and process of this project? There are many minority teens in low-income, low-opportunity areas who have unheard voices. Their self-esteem isn't cultivated and all of their portrayal in the media is negative. 2. CONTENT: What was the issue, need, idea or opportunity addressed by this project? Teen voices were unheard, opinions of them were based on negative media stereotypes, and many of them had very poor self-esteem. 3: FORM: What is the medium that was used to address or embody the content? Immersive theatre in the form of car-conversations that audience members could eavesdrop on. 4. STAKEHOLDERS: Which are the groups or individuals that were invested in the project? The teenagers were very invested because of their desire to free their voices. The adults who helped were invested because they wanted to help these kids start to change the narrative. And the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gun violence in the Hollywood industry

Hollywood wants gun control for everyone BUT THEM! In the society where the nudity on the screen (sometimes in the theater, even at CalArts) is a huge issue, gun violence scenes are in many movies in the Hollywood industry and nobody care. Actors sign their contracts, do their characters, get their awards and then try to talk about gun violence and share their moral beliefs. Come on, stop being hypocrites and say NO! ,, The US is home to both the largest percentage  of guns per capita and the most influential entertainment industry on earth. And while there is ceaseless debate over the violence in our nation, there is no question that, on our screens, it is at an all-time high — no more so than in PG-13 films .  Since that rating was created in 1985, deceptions of guns  on screen has more than tripled. Movies are more violent ratings more lenient, and overall gun-use in the film has risen approximately 51% in the last decade." https://www.refinery29.com/201...
Post a Comment
Read more