Skip to main content
Theater of the oppressed:

   





       Throughout the reading, I noticed that the typical fourth wall as we call it in the theater is broken

by asking the audience members for their opinion, as well as inviting them to the stage to interact

with the audience and be a part of the play in general. When the actors interact with the audience it

can be risky, the actor is risking either good or bad response from the audience member (usually not)


The way symbolism was represented served as a reminder that some symbols are interpreted as

something else in another country/state. Even gestures can sometimes signify or represent something

else.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mind Map

What a Riot - Bri Pattillo

   I like the Theater of the Oppressed methodology of the Joker. It sort of reminded me of El Pachuco in “Zoot Suit”, like this narrator commenting on all the action. I thought the Joker methodology was a good way to introduce a Theater of the Oppressed tactic into the piece. A lot of the Theater of the Oppressed options that we read about last week have an element of questioning within in them, but I think the Joker was a good one to use with young people. It was nice and cool that she was able to include the students’ actual questions into the play.     I did think her approach was rather problematic. She highlighted the problem herself and posed the question, “To whom and to what is the author beholden when writing a play for a specified population that has been invited to contribute to the playwriting process?” My problem was her answer, when she said that the students didn’t understand all of the references or language in the play. I don’t...

Assimilation Mind-Map by Jade Robinson